sean
Posts: 7382
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: March 05, 2012, 01:40:40 AM » |
|
I haven't seen it since then, but I remember 'All The Pretty Horses' wound up very high in my 2000 list. I was also a big fan of 'Proof of Life'.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Donnacha
Posts: 2851
I like you.
|
|
« Reply #31 on: March 05, 2012, 02:04:27 AM » |
|
2000 was the 1999 hangover.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Strang
Posts: 1232
|
|
« Reply #32 on: March 05, 2012, 02:09:02 AM » |
|
The entire year 2000 was pretty terrible for movies. Apart from X-MEN and a couple other stray bright spots, there wasn't much that was good. I think if we ranked it, THE WHOLE NINE YARDS could make my top five.
Why wouldn't we? When did we start listing things here? 2006? Also, X-Men being a bright spot is all the evidence you need to prove a year was terrible. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ExpendablesFan
Administrator
Posts: 5917
|
|
« Reply #33 on: March 05, 2012, 02:12:28 AM » |
|
I can't wait to put Whipped last.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dobbin
Posts: 6112
|
|
« Reply #34 on: March 05, 2012, 06:10:21 AM » |
|
HIGH FIDELITY was in 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Donnacha
Posts: 2851
I like you.
|
|
« Reply #35 on: March 05, 2012, 06:23:09 AM » |
|
Stop skipping ahead ten years! I haven't even finished 1990 yet and I need to be true to seven-year-old me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Strang
Posts: 1232
|
|
« Reply #36 on: March 05, 2012, 06:04:13 PM » |
|
Stop skipping ahead ten years! I haven't even finished 1990 yet and I need to be true to seven-year-old me.
Your head's not in this if someone uselessly saying what year a movie came out is distracting. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dobbin
Posts: 6112
|
|
« Reply #37 on: March 05, 2012, 09:15:08 PM » |
|
Useless. Yes. You're a pip.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sean
Posts: 7382
|
|
« Reply #38 on: March 05, 2012, 09:17:18 PM » |
|
Josh, you gotta make a list so somebody else can back me up on Rutger Hauer awesomeness in 1990.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Wolfe
Posts: 6865
|
|
« Reply #39 on: March 05, 2012, 09:55:16 PM » |
|
Everyone should make a list. Lists are the tops.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dobbin
Posts: 6112
|
|
« Reply #40 on: March 05, 2012, 10:55:43 PM » |
|
Josh, you gotta make a list so somebody else can back me up on Rutger Hauer awesomeness in 1990.
What year did WANTED:DEAD OR ALIVE with Rutger Hauer and Gene Simmons come out? That was the apex of Hauer Power. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Amusing Pseudonym
Posts: 4417
|
|
« Reply #41 on: March 05, 2012, 11:22:33 PM » |
|
What year did with Rutger Hauer and Gene Simmons come out? That was the apex of Hauer Power.
WANTED:DEAD OR ALIVE and NEVER TOO YOUNG TO DIE were 1986. I've never seen the former but the latter is like a movie adaptation of a drinking game. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dobbin
Posts: 6112
|
|
« Reply #42 on: March 05, 2012, 11:26:54 PM » |
|
Oh, you gotta. It has the best end one-liner of one-liner movie history.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BrianLynch
Administrator
Posts: 9389
|
|
« Reply #43 on: March 06, 2012, 01:21:49 AM » |
|
Oh, you gotta. It has the best end one-liner of one-liner movie history.
You gotta stop playing stuff up. There's no way this is true! You're setting us up for disappointment! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Donnacha
Posts: 2851
I like you.
|
|
« Reply #44 on: March 06, 2012, 05:44:11 AM » |
|
My producing teacher directed Wanted: Dead or Alive. And Poltergeist III.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
