DerickA
Posts: 9621
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: June 16, 2010, 08:10:47 PM » |
|
It seems like they're smaller than they should be. Aren't they supposed to be three apples high?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BrianLynch
Administrator
Posts: 9451
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 16, 2010, 11:12:18 PM » |
|
It's way cheaper and studios think hipper. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve B
Posts: 6115
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 16, 2010, 11:15:03 PM » |
|
It seems like they're smaller than they should be. Aren't they supposed to be three apples high?
yes, according too wikipedia "very short (as tall as 3 apples high)" From that clip I think they are pretty close. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 16, 2010, 11:32:40 PM by Steve B »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sean
Posts: 7430
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 17, 2010, 02:30:54 AM » |
|
Wouldn't a "live action" Smurf movie set entirely in the Smurf world be all CGI except for Gargamel?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Brandon
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 17, 2010, 02:57:53 AM » |
|
I love that studios think that putting a "Cool, popular" song into a trailer will make it cool and popular, but there's simply no reason for the Smurfs theme to be mashed-up with "Funky Cold Medina."
Actually, in principal that's actually pretty sweet, but it just annoyed me here.
Also: Smurf'd? Yikes. Not surprised, but yikes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
twitter.com/hellyesbrandon
|
|
|
Chris O.
Posts: 288
|
|
« Reply #20 on: June 17, 2010, 07:33:40 AM » |
|
Wasn't it "Wild Thing?" At least, "Funky Cold Medina" would've been slightly more obscure. But, yeah, that made a bland teaser just terrible. Like, if someone made a parody teaser making fun of the way studios would try to sell the Smurfs, they would use that song.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hayner
Posts: 1925
|
|
« Reply #21 on: June 17, 2010, 07:56:37 AM » |
|
And yet it'll make hundreds of millions of dollars. Was Alvin and the Chipmunks any good? I never got around to seeing it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LpF
Posts: 3869
|
|
« Reply #22 on: June 17, 2010, 01:48:29 PM » |
|
I enjoyed the first one. They matched the tone of the old 80s cartoon pretty well, I thought. Never bothered with the *sigh* squeakuel, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JCEFalconi
Posts: 3016
q tal
|
|
« Reply #23 on: June 17, 2010, 03:00:38 PM » |
|
I liked the mashup, I had a bigger problem with the suuuuuuuper generic boring clichéd thing they did with the monuments, someone should edit together all the times they've done that in teaser trailers.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve Lilley
Posts: 3910
|
|
« Reply #24 on: June 17, 2010, 03:24:31 PM » |
|
What's the point of MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE: THE MOVIE making mistakes if nobody learns from them?
You'd have a point, IF that movie had made any mistakes. It didn't. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LpF
Posts: 3869
|
|
« Reply #25 on: June 17, 2010, 04:26:02 PM » |
|
I'd call "a majority of the movie not being set in Eternia" a mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luke Erik
Posts: 7585
|
|
« Reply #27 on: January 11, 2011, 02:45:17 PM » |
|
 I like this poster. Which one is Diggy Simmons? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Donnacha
Posts: 2864
I like you.
|
|
« Reply #28 on: January 11, 2011, 03:29:46 PM » |
|
Smurfs have tails?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dobbin
Posts: 6150
|
|
« Reply #29 on: January 11, 2011, 04:03:32 PM » |
|
Smurfs have tails?
 Yuh-huh. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
